Archive | October 2012

Movie Review: Flight


To some people, there comes a time when the filmmakers we watch, grow up.

Take Steven Spielberg. While he wowed us with films like Raiders of the Lost Ark and E.T., he also wanted to explore more dramatic territory in the 1980’s. His early attempts with The Color Purple and Empire of the Sun netted him mixed reactions from many. Of course, it wasn’t until his bleak-yet-powerful release of Schindler’s List in 1993, did Spielberg truly begin to set foot into a more serious realm.

And now, that time appears to have come for director Robert Zemeckis.

The late 1990’s brought us several films where Zemeckis attempted to put us into more serious realms of storytelling, from his adaptation of Carl Sagan’s Contact, to the one-man-journey of Cast Away. While both films featured great performances from their leads and a wonderful use of ‘invisible effects,’ neither really got into the deep, R-rated territory that Spielberg had entered into.

Well, after the last decade in which he attempted to pioneer motion-capture in films (with The Polar Express, Beowulf, & A Christmas Carol), Zemeckis has returned to the land of live-action…and grown up.

Compared to the rest of Zemeckis’ filmography, much of Flight’s story and tone differs greatly from the live-action fare we saw him pull off in the 1990’s. The use of visual effects is kept to a minimum, and we’re meant to focus on the more human-element of the story.

Flight also marks Zemeckis’ first R-rated film since 1980’s raunchy comedy, Used Cars. However, the material in his latest film shows a story that is more dramatic. For those of you who have seen the first movie trailers, this is one of those films where that trailer is not going to do the film justice. If you think you’ve seen the entire movie in that little preview…you haven’t.

Pilot Whip Whitaker (Denzel Washington) starts a new day, making a short flight from Florida to Georgia. However, things take a violent turn when the commercial jetliner he’s co-piloting suddenly malfunctions. In a daring maneuver, Whip manages to pull off a miraculous landing, with minimal casualties. However, while many are quick to hail him as a hero, new questions slowly begin to surface regarding Whip.

There’s early award-season buzz regarding Denzel Washington’s turn as the film’s main star, and after seeing his performance, one can see why. The role Washington takes on as Whip is one that I think many would love to have landed, and seems to be based largely on subtlety. Steely eyes protrude from under his brows, as if attempting to shut you out from seeing what is going on inside his head. His character in Flight is one that you will question, and hopefully, grow concerned for.

Washington is buoyed by a rather renowned group of actors, such as Bruce Greenwood, Don Cheadle, and Kelly Reilly. There’s also a fun little ‘cameo’ of John Goodman playing a close ‘confidante’ of Denzel’s character. While Washington’s role as Whip is front and foremost, each of the actors mentioned gets a chance to shine as well, with Kelly Reilly standing out pretty quickly. When we first encounter her, she is one of the few enigmas in the structure of the film, but as it continues onward, she soon ends up becoming someone we can’t stop watching or listening to.

One thread weaved within the underbelly of the story, is the circumstances of the crash aftermath. Talk of God does figure into the story in several areas: does God pre-determine what will happen? Is Whip’s work part of His plan? Some choose to believe this, and others don’t. The film leaves this idea left open to the audience, yet doesn’t feel quite as ‘subtle’ as the God-vs-science talk in Contact. One such instance is where Whip goes to visit his injured co-pilot, whose wife sits nearby, parroting ‘Praise Jesus’ when the conversation turns to her husband’s survival.

Except for a few minor sequences, it feels that much of the special effects effort was placed into the creation of the film’s major plane crash sequence. Here is where Zemeckis’ camerawork seems to shine outside of the normal action films we see these days. Unlike Paul Greengrass-style shake-until-you-vomit cinematography, the camera is prone to very minimal shaking during the incident. We do get some turbulent camera movement, but we can always focus and know where our actors are in a scene. Many of us talking to Zemeckis in a post-Q&A following the film seemed in agreement that his ability to put us in the experience but not rattle our brains, was really well done.

Musically, composer Alan Silvestri returns as part of Zemeckis’ gang, but much like his work in Cast Away, the music he composes is comprised of just a few minimal pieces. Instead, Zemeckis puts most of the film’s music into the hands of various artists, using familiar tunes to encapsulate various moments, a technique similar to the music use in Forrest Gump.

One could almost call this the rebirth of Robert Zemeckis, but in truth, that’s not really being fair to him. His attempts to energize the landscape of motion-capture were valiant efforts, and I still believe he deserves some respect for that. Flight should simply be seen as another step in his continuing growth as a film director. With its streamlined budget and character-focused plot, several fans of the film I attended the screening with wondered what he could accomplish after this. If Flight does well, one can imagine him putting his skills into tackling another film that is just as dramatic and ‘adult’ as this one.

Rating: A-


“Flight” was screened as the closing night film of the Chicago Film Festival. After the screening, film festival president Michael Kutza (left) presented Robert Zemeckis (right) with the festival’s Founders Award. After a few words, Zemeckis did a small Q&A for 10-15 minutes.

Toy Review: Derpy Hooves vinyl figure

Exclusive Funko vinyl figure, only available at Hot Topic

With any major series or worldwide phenomenon, the fandom of such things often find some way to adopt a character, and push that character into the stratosphere of popularity.

Take Star Wars. George Lucas had wanted to make the bounty hunter Boba Fett a simple, silent-but-deadly bounty hunter intent on capturing Han Solo. Instead, Fett’s popularity opened a new realm of fandom related to speculation, expanded universe stories, and much more.

When it comes to the recently-popular revamp of My Little Pony, the show’s growing fandom rallied around a character who was essentially a mistake. Online fandom soon began to follow a grey-colored, blonde-haired pegasus pony with crossed eyes, who began to be known in the MLP fan community as Derpy Hooves.

The scene from the first episode of “My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic,” that launched Derpy’s fanbase.

Once the show’s creators found out about how popular she was with the fans, they began to give her minor background appearances (ala Where’s Waldo?). In Season 2 of the series, the showrunners gave her a few minutes in the spotlight, and a cute-yet-dopey voice to match her try-but-often-clumsily-fail persona.

However, those few minutes roused the ire of some parents, who contacted Hasbro to say that Derpy’s name, crossed eyes, and dopey actions were seen as offensive to disabled persons. And with that, Derpy’s moment was re-edited, and her television name was now to be Ditzy-Doo.

Specialty retail stores like Hot Topic would keep the merchandising of Derpy alive with t-shirts and hats, but many fans wanted a figure of her that could stand next to the others that Hasbro had made.

They got their wish in the Summer of 2012, when Hasbro released Derpy as a San Diego Comic-Con exclusive. Packaged in a special box with no name on it (maybe Hasbro was afraid to use the fan name for fear of more parental teeth-gnashing?), the figures quickly sold out, and reached prices of $90+ on eBay. While many wanted a Derpy Hooves figure, some of us had limits on just how wide our wallets would open up.

Proportion comparison between Derpy in her animated form, and vinyl figure form.

And then, salvation came in vinyl form, from Funko. Known for their numerous, block-headed/beady-eyed interpretations of pop-culture figures, Funko has entered the arena of My Little Pony merchandising with its recent releases of Derpy Hooves and Rainbow Dash to Hot Topic stores. Personally, this could be just the ticket for some of the older, more die-hard fanatics. While many love the series, it’s safe to assume that Hasbro is not going to devote much of their marketing power to target older fans. This seems to be the niche that Funko is filling, and with these recent releases, I think they may definitely have a good source of new income on their hands.

The packaging Funko has wrapped their pony figures in is definitely different from the packaging one is used to when it comes to MLP toys from Hasbro. The biggest shock: not a single bit of pink on the packaging! I don’t think any other MLP products have even had this much black on their packaging.

Behold…the pony with no name!

Unlike the vinyl figure release of Rainbow Dash, Derpy has no name on her packaging. Instead, she is titled with an ‘I Heart’ moniker that seems like code for fans of the series. Though it does make me wonder what non-MLP fans or young kids will think her name is. It should be noted that even though her name shows up nowhere on the packaging, she did ring up in the system as Derpy Vinyl.

Once out of the package, Derpy is a very solid figure. If she hits the floor, she’s going to make alot of noise, or hurt somebody.

Given her non-Hasbro production, Derpy’s size is slightly larger than the regular-sized ponies. Most impressive about Funko’s figure is the sculpting that has been done. Derpy’s body is more in scale and design to the original character work on the show, with legs that taper closer to the body, and wide hooves. Unlike Hasbro’s toys, this figure comes with non-grooming, sculpted hair, which definitely helps those of us who want a figure with volume in her hair.

For those looking for super-accuracy, you’ll have to keep wishing. Paint applications on her eyes do not gradate from orange to yellow, and her ‘cutie mark’ in the form of several bubbles, only adorns her right flank, and not both as in the cartoon. Also, the sweep of her mane only goes down her left side, and not down either side as in the cartoon series.

One area where the sculpting gets iffy, is in the front-view of Derpy’s face. In the cartoons, the front of the face is ‘cheated’ by being a simple oval shape. Here, we have some ‘blocky cheeks’ and some rounded dimensionality that warps the eyes slightly. But, this is often a side-effect when one takes a 2-dimensional character, and makes them 3-D.

Does Derpy have…stretch marks?

Assembly of the figure is made up of the separate hair pieces, the head, wings, and body. Unlike the smoother vinyl textures of Funko’s other figures, Derpy’s is not perfectly smooth. If you look at her up close, you’ll see some slight abnormalities. As well, the area where the head joins to the neck is not a perfect/clean line. Btw, in case you were wondering, no, her head does not turn.

It isn’t the greatest My Little Pony fan-figure, but I think it comes incredibly close. I’m sure word-of-mouth about these Funko figures will spread quickly among fans and customizers (who will most likely buy extra figures to disassemble and fan-make other characters from the series).

Derpy (and Rainbow Dash) currently retail for $14.50 (plus tax) at Hot Topic.

Word is, a third pony may be making its way to Hot Topic shelves from Funko soon. On Funko’s Facebook page, they did say that more ponies would be making their way into collector’s hands in 2013, and they would not be just Hot Topic exclusives. I’m sure this will give some hope to adult collectors of the series, leaving them hope of seeing fan-loved background ponies that most likely would not be produced by Hasbro.

“A-ba-derp aba-derp a-ba-derp, that’s all folks!”

Retro Recaps: Amazing Stories – Go to the Head of the Class

Retro Recaps is where we will look back at old television episodes from the past, and analyze their story, content, and much more.


One of my favorite television series that my Dad turned me onto when I was little, is The Twilight Zone. The weekly anthology of different stories with strange twists was also a favorite of many in Hollywood, including Steven Spielberg. In fact, when Steven Spielberg found out the story Duel (about a man terrorized by a semi truck) was written by former Twilight Zone writer Richard Matheson, he was eager to direct it. Steven even directed a segment for the Twilight Zone film released in 1983, based on the episode, Kick the Can.

In 1985, Spielberg seemed to follow in Rod Serling’s foosteps even further, when he created the anthology series Amazing Stories that ran on the ABC network. Sadly, the show only lasted for 2 seasons, but it was almost like a playground for Spielberg and his cohorts. While the majority of the episodes took up a half-hour of television time, there was one anomaly in the second season: the hour-long episode titled, Go to the Head of the Class.

While I have memories of a few Amazing Stories episodes, this was one I couldn’t recall (maybe it was due to the ‘parental discretion advised’ warning on the episode). Years later, I wanted to see it because it was almost the equivalent of a Back to the Future reunion, featuring the following people:

Robert Zemeckis – Director

Bob Gale – Co-writer for the Teleplay

Alan Silvestri – Music


Christopher Lloyd – as Professor B.O. Beanes

The short also employed Stan Winston Studios to help with some of the props. But, we’ll get to that later on. Let’s recap, shall we?


The episode opens with a clip from 1959’s The House on Haunted Hill. We then transition to later in the morning, as the camera moves around an unkempt room. The camera-work for this set-up is similar to the beginning of Back to the Future, where the camera showed us Doc Brown’s laboratory. In this case, the room is that of Peter Brand (Scott Coffey). As the camera pans around the room, we see that he seems obsessed with two things: a girl whose picture appears all over his room, and horror movies.

The camera then shows us Peter in bed, awoken by his (ghoulish-looking) phone. It’s his Mother, calling to tell him he’s late for school…again! Peter quickly snaps into action.

A minor comedy point follows, as Peter has padlocked the room to his door, and only comes and goes through his bedroom window. We hear his Mom off-camera demanding he do something about this, making her one of those ‘all-talk/do-nothing’ parents.

The next thing we see is the classroom of Professor B.O. Beanes (Christopher Lloyd), with the Professor going full tilt discussing one of his favorite playwrights: William Shakespeare. Clad in a tweed blazer with a black scarf around his neck, Beanes’ voice seems to demand attention, as well as annoyance to be lecturing to ‘creatures’ he deems unable to appreciate the Bard’s work.

It is during this time that Peter attempts to sneak into the class…but is overheard by Beanes. The Professor interrupts his lesson to give Peter a tardy slip, promising that if he gets one more, “I’ll have you right where I want you…in detention.” (3 years later, in 1989, Vice-Principal Strickland would utter the same line to Biff Tannen in Back to the Future Part II).

As Beanes turns back to his lesson, a girl nearby whispers to Peter if he has her homework. This is Cynthia Simpson (Mary Stuart Masterson), of whom Peter has pictured all over his bedroom, though her appearance looks nothing like the presentable young woman in the pictures we saw. In fact, she’s the only person in the class who doesn’t seem to be appropriately attired for school.

Peter quickly passes some papers to Cynthia, as Beanes continues to speak of murder in the Bard’s play, Macbeth, and how Lady Macbeth used the promise and withholding of sex to manipulate those around her. Beanes states that such practices are still happening even to this day, before handing back essays to the class, with the majority of them having been given an ‘F’ grade. It is when he gets to Cynthia that he takes notice, for both hers and Peter’s essay papers were identical! Beanes demands to know who plagiarized the others paper, or else both will be punished. Almost as proof that Beanes is right about women controlling men, Cynthia doesn’t bat an eyelash, and Peter says he copied her paper.

The expression on Beanes’ face seems to show that he believes it is Cynthia who is the guilty party, but he hands back her essay, claiming it’s ‘C+’ was the highest grade in the class.

For punishment, Peter is forced to ‘Meet the Misters.’ This involves him kneeling on the floor in front of the class, with several heavy tomes stacked in each hand. Beanes promises Peter that if he drops any of the books, ‘he’ll have his head.’ We then see Peter looking utterly humiliated, as the rest of the class chuckles and giggles at his predicament, with Cynthia refusing to make eye-contact with him.

After school, Cynthia meets up with Peter, and the two talk about how they’d like to get back at Beanes. Cynthia claims that a record she got Peter called Blood Sausage, has all sorts of spells and incantations that are revealed when the tracks are played backwards. She tells Peter to play a song called “Teacher’s Threat” backwards, and it’ll reveal a way to get back at Beanes. Before Peter can get a word in, she tells him she’ll come over to his place that evening.

Before Cynthia comes over, Peter rigs his record player to run backwards, and an eerie voice (sounding like an imitation of Vincent Price), begins to list the ingredients for “The Curse of Delcite.”

The curse calls for the following to be combined at the stroke of midnight by ‘the combined hand of woman and man’:

– a graven image

– rose water

– katydids

– dirt from a freshly-dug grave

– the fingertip of a blood relative

After listening to the ingredients, Peter wonders just what the curse is, when a black, long-fingered claw grabs his face!

Peter quickly breaks free, but hits his head on a nearby overhang, and collapses next to his bed.

However, it turns out the claw was just a monster glove that Cynthia wore to play a trick on him. Looking around his room, she quickly takes most of Peter’s obsessive feelings about her in stride (she also doesn’t question why he has photos of her all over the place…just mentioning that she hates how she looks in them).

Changing the subject, Peter asks just what “The Curse of Delcite” is, and Cynthia tells him that it gives the victim hiccups. She knows this because she used it on her Mom previously, giving her a bad case of hiccups for 3 days. Though the spell calls for specific ingredients, Cynthia tells Peter she substituted a lock of her Grandmother’s hair for the fingertip of a blood relative that is described in the spell.

Peter is still unsure of using the curse on Beanes but Cynthia feels that this would be the perfect revenge on their teacher, as hiccups would leave him unable to properly speak in class.

The two then sneak off to the nearby cemetery to procure ingredients. Cynthia manages to get Peter to jump into an open grave to retrieve some freshly-dug dirt, before they make their way to the Beanes family mausoleum nearby. After breaking open the lock with a sledgehammer, Cynthia prepares a cauldron with the ingredients, but leaves Peter to retrieve a fingertip from the tomb of Ebenezer Beanes nearby.

Peter attempts to cut off a fingertip, just as a clock outside begins to chime 12. Suspense builds as Peter continues to work with the dull pair of scissors, before severing the whole hand of Beanes’ relation.

With no time left, the two toss the hand into the cauldron, causing an otherworldly sound to issue forth, and green fire to shoot up into the air. One assumes that Cynthia didn’t see this happen when she used the curse on her Mom, as she quickly runs away , with Peter close behind.

After the entire ordeal, Cynthia just wants to go home, but Peter wants to be sure that the curse they cast has actually worked. Going to Beanes’ home (shot low-angle like most gothic horror-film houses), the two peek inside one of the windows…

…only to see Beanes’ body collapsed on the floor! Breaking through the nearby door, they find that he is dead. Cynthia tries to convince Peter that this wasn’t their fault, but Peter points to a nearby clock, that seems to have stopped exactly at midnight. Cynthia requests that they just leave the body for the Police to find, but Peter notes that their fingerprints are on the door and the body.

They then realize there is a way to get around this predicament: they need to bring Beanes back to life. Luckily, there’s another song on the Blood Sausage album, that contains steps for resurrection when played backwards.

Peter and Cynthia then attempt to follow the steps, but are forced to make a few changes. When Cynthia asks for a ‘graven image,’ Peter finds a copy of the school’s yearbook nearby, and begins to turn pages until he comes to the one with Beanes on it.

In his haste to tear it out of the yearbook, he ‘severs’ the head of the picture, and rips the page out in two pieces. For ‘water of resurrection,’ Cynthia provides mineral water.

At first, it seems the spell hasn’t worked, when suddenly, all the windows fly open, and lightning illuminates the room. From the bed, Beanes starts to make small guttural sounds in his throat.

As the two watch, his body sits up…but his head (due to Peter’s handling of the yearbook photo), remains on the pillow. But it isn’t silent, and addresses both of them:

“Mister Brand, Miss Simpson, prepare to Meet The Misters!”

It’s interesting to note that unlike the rather grumpy mood that Beanes had in the classroom, his resurrection seems to have made him a little off-kilter.

Peter and Cynthia attempt to get out of the house, but Beanes’ body picks up the severed head, and begins to come after them. It’s interesting to note that this is where Stan Winston Studios takes over, using several different types of severed heads with Lloyd’s likeness for long and medium-shots. Today, we can see which shots are faked, but I can’t help but feel this scene definitely would have freaked out my 6-year-old mind at the time (in fact, I did find a couple people online who were around the same age I was, and these scenes scared them at the time!).

Even though his head is severed, Beanes does not control the movements of his own body, and it seems to have a ‘mind’ of its own. It lobs Beanes’ head around, scaring Peter and Cynthia as they run from room to room.

One of the unexpected moments comes when they barricade the door in the Professor’s kitchen…only to not realize there’s a pet door, and through which Beanes’ severed head comes rolling through, promising that they ‘won’t escape his wrath!’

The two kids eventually make their way outside, and climb over a nearby fence, with Beanes and his body in pursuit. Peter sees a bus approaching, and tries to get the driver’s attention.

The bus doesn’t stop for him, and it is at this moment that Cynthia chooses to abandon Peter, jumping on the rear-bumper of the bus as it speeds off!

With no mode of transportation and Cynthia having deserted him, Peter turns to find Beanes approaching, and pleads for his life, claiming that Cynthia made him do what he did.

“Sex made you do it, Mr Brand,” replies Beanes’ head. “You should have paid attention to Macbeth, instead of Cynthia!”

It should be noted that Beanes breaks up the syllables in Cynthia’s name, so that the first part of her name comes out sounding like ‘sin.’

Peter takes off running down the street, trying to stay as far away from Beanes as possible. As the thunder and lightning pound around him, we also see that the cars on the street are vintage 50’s vehicles, almost as if Peter is in an old horror film.

Peter eventually makes it to his open bedroom window and climbs inside, but not before Beanes’ body catches up to him, and tosses the head through the window (shades of The Headless Horseman from Legend of Sleepy Hollow). Peter catches the head, which sends him pinwheeling across his room, before crumpling against his nightstand. The last thing he hears is the severed head ‘wanting to see him in detention.’

The next morning, Peter wakes up to his phone ringing. It’s his Mom, berating him for being late to school again. However, there’s no sign of the severed head. Was it all just a dream?

Peter makes his way to class, where he comes across several strange sights.

The first is Cynthia, who is wearing more ‘conforming’ clothing, and appears to have ‘Met The Misters’ at the front of the class.

The second is that everyone is writing away at their desks in unison, heads down, and concentrating.

Peter sits down at his desk, when a hand suddenly grabs his shoulder!

Turning around, he sees that it is Beanes, who claims that Peter’s tardiness today has earned him a one-way ticket to detention.

Peter admits that he’s fine with detention, and is just glad that Beanes is okay.

“Well, actually,” says Beanes, “I have a bit of a sore-”


Whipping off his black scarf, Beanes reveals the stitches that have reattached his head to his body, laughing maniacally as Peter stares wide-eyed in horror!


And that was Go to the Head of the Class. It isn’t the greatest hour of television, but it does get merits for its homage to old horror films. Robert Zemeckis’ work has often been about creating certain levels of nostalgia, and also the fact that his screenwriting partner Bob Gale had a hand in the episode, there’s definitely little flourishes of greatness.

One should note that if you’re a fan of Zemeckis and Gale’s work, you can see little traits of their creative partnership come out in this episode. Much like the two added lots of layers into Back to the Future, Head of the Class contains plenty of subtle little things that one might not see the first time through.

Also, I think knowing the outcome of the ending of the episode can spoil things for people. Before I saw this, the one image I had seen associated with the episode was Christopher Lloyd’s severed head smiling maniacally, lying on a tile floor. During the middle of the show, the filmmakers attempt to make you think that Peter passed out, and everything from Cynthia coming over, to him being chased by Beanes’ body and head was all a dream, brought about by the events of the day (everything from Beanes talking about Macbeth to telling Peter he would ‘have his head’ could have all been percolating in his brain, and spewed forth into a nightmare brought upon by his love of horror films). This almost mirrors the scenes in Back to the Future, where we see Marty in bed before Doc Brown calls him, and then later on, with him waking up in his bed at the end, thinking the whole time-travel journey was a ‘nightmare.’

Speaking of horror films, the story/teleplay writer Mick Garris, and additional teleplay co-writer Tom McLoughlin seemed just as suited for this episode, as the guys who wrote the episode Miscalculation. Both Garris and McLoughlin even took ‘stabs’ at Stephen King-related works.

Character-wise, Peter Brand is probably one of the most milquetoast male leads that Zemeckis and Gale have used. He’s almost like Marty McFly (a reactive character), but not even 1/10th as cool. Peter just subsists on a life of pining for Cynthia, and watching horror films, almost making this a slight ‘be careful what you wish for’ teleplay.

Then again, Peter’s character is there to be wrapped around Cynthia’s finger, as she manages to get him to do all sorts of things for her from her homework, to diving into a grave to retrieve freshly-dug dirt). Masterson appears to have the more fun role of the two, being the boss in this relationship. One has to also note there is one fatal flaw in her use of the ‘Curse of Delcite’ on her Mother. The spell calls for it to be cast by ‘the united hand of woman and man,’ so who was the man she cast that spell with?

And then we have Christopher Lloyd, channeling the eccentric and the slightly looney, but also getting into a deep, perturbed area. Lloyd can play annoyed and eccentric pretty well (he played an artist with these traits in two episodes of the TV series Cheers), but he also makes great use of facial expressions. Some funny moments come after Peter and Cynthia find him, and his face is frozen in a look of shock. Lloyd holds this expression even when Peter attempts to drag him up some stairs.

All-in-all, the episode seems like it would have been far more at-home in the HBO anthology series, Tales from the Crypt. Of course, it just so happens that Robert Zemeckis made his way over to that series, serving as Producer and Director in several capacities to that show later on.

Word was that by the second season of Amazing Stories, much of the audience was abandoning ship, and there was a struggle by the network to get people to watch, including ramping up the advertisements for this episode. Back during the VHS days, Head of the Class was released as part of an 2-episode set with the Brad Bird-directed Family Dog episode. Today, one can only find the episode floating around on the internet, or part of sets released by bootleggers.

A few years ago, Universal Studios released the first season of Amazing Stories on DVD, but the second season never materialized on American shores. Word is, that it did show up on Region 2 DVD in Japan (once again proving that Marty McFly’s statement that ‘all the best stuff is made in Japan’ still holds true today!).

Oh, and one more thing. It seems that Steven Spielberg inserted a little in-joke into this episode too. When Peter is flipping through the yearbook in Beanes’ home, he comes across a page showing Principal Sid Sheinberg. The truth is, Sid is a real person. He was not only the President and COO of MCA/Universal Pictures, but was also instrumental in helping Spielberg get his start in movies (in one interview, Sid even claimed that that would most likely end up written on his tombstone some day).

Blu-Ray Review: Little Shop of Horrors – The Directors’s Cut


On the twenty-third day of the month of September,
In an early year of a decade not too long before our own,
The human race suddenly encountered, a deadly threat to its very existence.

And this terrifying enemy surfaced,
As such enemies often do,
In the seemingly most innocent, and unlikely, of places.


This October, there were numerous titles on the lips of many people regarding Blu-Ray discs. These included E.T. The Extra-Terrestrial and Prometheus, But for myself and many others, there was one release that just trumped them all as a must-have: Little Shop of Horrors – The Directors’s Cut.

Before they found worldwide acclaim in helping with Disney’s second animation renaissance, Howard Ashman and Alan Menken had their first major success off-Broadway in 1982, when they adapted the Roger Corman film Little Shop of Horrors into a stage production. Producer David Geffen then set out to make a film of the production, and landed Frank Oz to direct. At the time, Frank was known for working with Jim Henson as a puppeteer, and later as co-director on The Dark Crystal and The Muppets Take Manhattan. Little Shop would be Frank’s first solo directorial outing, but in a way, the film’s semi-crazy premise involving a blood thirsty, world-dominating plant seemed just the thing as he started to make his way as a film director.

As well, Frank wasn’t that far from some of his Henson collaborators. Though the film does not credit Jim Henson’s Creature Shop for the Audrey II plant effects, Frank borrowed many craftsmen and puppeteers to pull off everything from the cable-controlled ‘baby’ plant, to the enormous one-ton monstrosity at the end of the film that took 60 puppeteers to operate.

Little Shop of Horrors is a production that is one of those strange ‘concoctions’ of a film. It’s a 50’s B-movie with its blood-thirsty plant, a 60’s period piece with a Greek chorus of girls in the vein of The Supremes, and to wrap it up, connections to the German story of Faust.

The film’s screenplay, written by the stage production’s bookwriter/lyricist Howard Ashman, retains much of that production vibe, but it definitely feels that Howard knew that what worked on an open stage, was going to need some tweaking with moving cameras and multiple sets.

I’m ashamed to say I’ve never seen a stage production of Little Shop, so I won’t be firing off a comparison list on what the film hits and misses…with the exception of one little thing that this Blu-Ray release brings to light.


The Director’s Cut

To many who have never seen a production of Little Shop, or read up on the history of the material, the ending that was in the original 1986 release, was not ‘true’ to the original production, or the intended ending. Much like the story of Faust, Seymour’s ‘deal with the devil’ (aka the plant, Audrey II) would not only take the life of an innocent girl, but his own life as well.

Test audiences loved the film, until the very end when the boy and girl they were so focused on, ended up as plant food. The final test-audience scores didn’t even merit the possibility of a release, so the final ending in which Seymour electrocutes the plant to death was created. Seymour mans up, gets Audrey, and the two live happily ever after (even though he’s responsible for feeding Orin Scrivello and Mr Mushnik to the plant).

Many wondered about the original ending for years, which also included a big B-movie extravaganza in which the the plants take over the world ‘Godzilla-style.’ Still-images were shown in special effects magazines like Cinefex, but noone ever expected the lost ending to resurface.

Then, in 1998, Warner Brothers decided to release the film on DVD. When they contacted Frank Oz if he had any parts of the original ending, he produced a copy of the black-and-white test-screening footage, which ended up being put on the DVD as an extra. However, David Geffen requested WB pull the remaining copies off the shelves asap, and replacements were made minus the test footage. Rumor was that Geffen either didn’t want to acknowledge the original ending, or that he had the color negatives WB wanted, and wanted to release a true director’s cut at some point.

The original cut of Little Shop was seen as the holy grail among some film viewers over the years. Of the discs that were purchased before the recall, some made their way onto eBay, and fetched upwards of $200. In recent years, the footage even ended up on several people’s Youtube accounts.

Some have said the ‘plants-taking-over’ ending doesn’t quite work, but if you’ve seen some of the stuff that Frank Oz did with Jim Henson, it does work in its strange way. Plus, the Director’s Cut can finally show the impressive model-work that was often seen in still photographs. Millions of dollars were spent to build the miniature landscapes and detailed vehicles that were eventually destroyed in the onslaught.

This new cut of the film was made after searching all of the Warner Brothers vaults for color material. Finding almost every single piece of footage, it put to rest the rumor that Geffen was the only one who had the color negatives.

The Director’s Cut does follow the original test-screening cut to the ‘T,’ but it also feels that if that original ending had been used, they would have spent the final months before the big release, making the monster-movie ending a little ‘tighter’ in places. It almost feels like disaster-porn, given how after awhile, we get lots and lots of images of building walls blowing out, and being crushed into powder.

One side-effect to putting this ending together, is that a new audio track had to be mixed for the ending, which was mainly music and dialogue with no sound effects. The added sound effects work pretty well, and in some scenes, help sell the violence of the actions in some scenes.

Some have voiced some displeasure that in the scene where Seymour meets his fate within the gaping jaws of Audrey II, that he appears to be screaming, but we hear no sound. I find the scene plays well with just the music, kind of like we’re inside Seymour’s own personal hell as he meets his demise.

One item that has been dubbed in in later scenes, are the rampaging plant’s laughter. It doesn’t quite sound like Levi Stubbs (who voiced Audrey II), but unless that’s one of your pet peeves, it’s rather unnoticeable to the common person.


My Thoughts on The Film(s)

One of the great things that Warner Brothers has done, is issue the Blu-Ray with both the theatrical and director’s cuts. I find this a great bargain, as some may prefer one cut over the other, or some may choose to go back-and-forth, analyzing how each of them differ in tone.

When considering both cuts, it’s like coming to a fork in the road. There’s one school of thought that these poor kids (Seymour and Audrey) are trapped in a place they’ll never escape from, and the audience wants them to succeed. Such downtrodden, meek individuals can often win over an audience, who wants them to reach their dreams. As well, Audrey’s dream sequence shows the dreams of a sweet girl who wants a happy and better place.

On the other hand, one thing that can probably cloud the judgement of the audience, is regarding the death of Orin, the masochistic dentist. Even though some can believe him to be a monster that deserved to die, Seymour commits a terrible sin by killing him, thus starting off the series of chain reactions that leads to bigger things, but leaves him with unnerving feelings of guilt for what he’s done. As well, Seymour is in danger of losing everything when Mr Mushnik the flower shop owner finds out what he’s done. However, Seymour can’t bring himself to lose his chance with Audrey, and gets Mushnik eaten as well.

After having seen both cuts, it’s hard to go back to the theatrical cut once I saw the original. To me, I prefer the heart-break as Audrey dies in Seymour’s arms, and is then consumed by the plant. I was surprised when watching the scene where Seymour presents her body to the plant, I started to get emotional. There’s a little moment where as she slides into the plant’s mouth, we see her hand just brush the outer lip of the plant. Seymour attempts to reach for it, to touch his beloved one last time, but it slides past the plant’s lips, and she’s gone forever.

I also like the rather dark humor of the director’s cut ending, where we see that miniature Audrey II’s have been grown and placed on store shelves across the country, with the masses of people clamoring for their own. It put me in mind of the mad dash in the last 30 years for things like Cabbage Patch Kids, Tickle-Me Elmo’s, and Beanie Babies.  Though at least those toys weren’t bent on consuming human blood to grow for world conquest.

While I don’t outright hate the theatrical cut, I’ll be fine with the director’s cut from now on. The 1980’s had some films in which early testing changed a film’s darker tone (like Terry GIlliam’s Brazil). The atmosphere of filmmaking feels a little like today and some studios. The only difference is that in today’s audience, there’s the push to edit out blood and gore to make a film more ‘profitable’ by pushing it into PG-13 territory.


Special Features

There isn’t that much new in the way of special features, unless you count the Director’s Cut as one of them. With the exception of a re-edited feature and a small retrospective, it’s almost all been seen before.

-Digibook Packaging (Blu-Ray only) – Several of Warner Brothers’ Blu-Ray titles have been released in this format, with the disc encased in a small book. Each book contains pictures and information about the film. There’s also a small insert containing a personal message from Frank Oz. Unlike the Digibook releases I got for Dr Strangelove and The Matrix, the design work on this release is a little higher in quality. Images intermingled with the text are of a glossy nature. The text on the pages covers a little on the making of the film, the original ending, quotes and dialogue from the film. A very nice cornucopia of information.

-Original Theatrical Commentary by Frank Oz – Recorded for the 1998 DVD release of the theatrical cut, Frank does a solo commentary, explaining some of his filming decisions, camera set-ups, and even some little things that peeve him. Notable is how certain sets and even actor’s movements were often dependent on musical beats, and how many there would be in a scene.

-Frank Oz and Little Shop of Horrors: The Director’s Cut – This is the only new special featurette included. Frank lays out for the viewer, the whole sad story of what brought the original film to be cut into its final form. We even get some interview snippets from Richard Conway, who was responsible for much of the model work that went into the excised ending.

-A Story of Little Shop of Horrors – This segment, originally made around the time of the film’s release, gives a 23-minute summary of the evolution from Roger Corman B-movie, to Off-Broadway hit, to big-screen return. We get candid snippets from the cast, producer David Geffen, and director Frank Oz. Also, we get to see the creation of the sets and Audrey II, as well as some scenes of the crew operating the puppets, which are a plus in my book. What’s a little sad, is that even though it is a musical, we don’t get any clips of Howard Ashman, or Alan Menken talking about developing the Off-Broadway production, or even Howard talking about translating the production to the big screen.

Outtakes and Deleted Scenes – These are more like a goulash of scenes. We see flubbed lines, crew members posing with the three singing girls, and numerous effects shots being staged or filmed. There’s even a couple cheeky shots in there as well. There was even supposed to be a dream sequence for the song The Meek Shall Inherit, and we see a few seconds of the crew dancing through the smoky atmosphere. There’s also a funny scene where we see two enormous Audrey II’s terrorizing New York, and off to the side, an enormous human hand sprinkling dust and debris down. The scenes also have a commentary track with Frank Oz giving his thoughts.

-Director’s Cut Ending with Commentary by Frank Oz – The audio’s (kinda) the same, but the image isn’t. This was the audio commentary that Frank recorded in 1998 for the DVD release, where he discussed the original ending, over the black-and-white footage he provided for the DVD release. Back then, the track that was used was temporary audio with just basic vocals and some music. It may sound odd when Frank begins saying things like ‘we would have music here,’ and ‘there would be plenty of sound effects there,’ and you can faintly hear them from the newly-revised ending.

– Movie Trailers – We get to see both the Teaser and Theatrical trailers. The Teaser trailer attempts to look like a B-movie, with some key words flying at the audience.


In Conclusion

You’re never going to please everybody. They couldn’t do it back in 1986, and even with this set, they won’t be able to please those who have waited over 25 years for this release.

I think some would have loved a retrospective with the cast and crew, or even a feature discussing the late Howard Ashman. Howard has been mentioned by name in many of the making-of specials I have from Disney (such as Waking Sleeping Beauty), but Little Shop was one of the first big commercial successes he had before he was eventually brought into The Walt Disney Company.

Even so, for those of us who have never owned the film, or had the copy with the black-and-white ending, it is definitely worth it to me.

In the last few months, I’ve been going around the internet just looking for information about Little Shop of Horrors, and I thought I’d include a few links here: – Maintained by his sister Sarah, if you were ever curious to know more about Howard Ashman, this is the place.

Mondo Musicals – The owner of this web blog, has been a huge fan of Little Shop of Horrors for quite some time. If you search his page, you’ll find plenty of articles, ranging from analyzing the Roger Corman film, to pictures of some original props he obtained from a puppeteer who worked on the film!


Final Analysis

Director’s Cut of the film – B+

Theatrical Cut of the film – B

The Blu-Ray package (with both film versions, digibook packaging, and special features) – B+

One memorable scene from the original Roger Corman film, was Jack Nicholson playing a patient who enjoys the dentist’s painful procedures. In the 1986 film, Frank Oz does an homage to this scene, using Bill Murray as the pain-loving man named Arthur Denton. Here, Denton grows curious as a Mother and Daughter exits Orin’s room. FYI, the little girl is Heather Henson, Jim Henson’s daughter.

Book Review: The Men Who Would Be King: An Almost Epic Tale of Moguls, Movies, and a Company Called DreamWorks

Reading Nicole LaPorte’s The Men Who Would Be King, was almost like going back for a high school reunion, and remembering the old days. As I made my way through the pages, visions of my entertainment-obsessed teen years quickly came back into view.

It was big news in the fall of 1994 when Steven Spielberg, Jeffrey Katzenberg, and David Geffen sat down in front of reporters, and announced they were going to be founding the first new American film studio since Hollywood’s Golden Age. I remember the Time Magazine cover with the three partners, articles about their grand plans for a 21st century studio in Playa Vista, CA, and of course, the company’s quest to break out of a monotonous studio system, and make a utopia where artists were free to express themselves based on ideas, and not marketability. Quality would be the mantra for the studios’ film, television, music, and digital media divisions. However, the dream never quite solidified, and the studio found itself struggling, before soon throwing up its hands and creating less-than-stellar product just to try and stay afloat (remember the 2003 sports drama Biker Boyz? Anyone?).

When compiling the information for her book on the rise and fall of Dreamworks SKG, LaPorte (a former editor for Variety) first attempted to get the story straight from the founders themselves. As one can expect, they didn’t give in to her requests. Of those who were willing to talk, some are mentioned by name, and many are simply titled ‘source.’ Those listed as a ‘source,’ were often very cautious about talking about the company. One meeting that LaPorte had with a ‘source,’ sounded similar to the scene in JFK where Jim Garrison (Kevin Costner) met an informant named “X” (Donald Sutherland).

LaPorte quickly starts building up character archetypes with the three moguls. Spielberg is portrayed almost like a genius-level child, whose ideas and creativity are nurtured to the point where his sensitivity to bad news and negativity is shielded by everyone around him. Katzenberg is the guy who is seen as very quick and always in motion, but cross him, and he isn’t so forgiving. Geffen had always been the enigma whenever I heard the ‘SKG’ moniker. Of the three, LaPorte paints him in a more serious, business-like light. Geffen quickly becomes the person doing most of the heavy-lifting behind the scenes, and is pretty quick with the expletives.

In the first 15 pages, I started having uncertain flashbacks to Ben Mezrich’s The Accidental Billionaires (the unauthorized biography on the founding of Facebook).As the journey into her book began, LaPorte would try to intricately paint scenes with words. However, her work in crafting entertainment-related articles for Variety seems to have helped her writing this book, as I soon got over my fears, and eagerly settled in to reading her story. Unlike Mezrich, LaPorte has plenty of articles and sources regarding her subject, to make the text ‘flow.’

Even so, one thing that may bog down some readers, are the endless amount of names that have played a part in the story of Dreamworks. Many of them that were showbiz names (like Cameron Crowe, Sam Mendes, & Robert Zemeckis) I already had knowledge of. But when it came to some like Paramount Pictures CEO Brad Grey, I had a little trouble comprehending. Then again, maybe it was my inner fanboy reacting negatively as LaPorte pegged Grey as one of the men who seemed disrespectful of Dreamworks.

Dreamworks SKG, as a start-up studio, found itself in a world much different than the early 20th century studios that Spielberg and his cohorts attempted to emulate. In a world where merchandising and home video catalogue titles can help fatten the bottom line of a studio, the start-up had none of these things. However, the ‘K’ and ‘G’ of the studio would often play up their wild card: The Big ‘S.’ Katzenberg and Geffen would often have Spielberg as their poster-boy, and Katzenberg could often sway people into joining the new company by giving them a few moments to chat with Steven. This led to investors showing interest in the company, and even helped Katzenberg lure away some artists from Disney, as he began to start into Dreamworks‘ animation division.

Many people were expecting the studio was going to come charging out of the gate with plenty of product shortly after the big announcement. As it stood, it would take almost 3 years before anything with the Dreamworks logo hit theaters, with only a select few being truly made by Dreamworks. Many of the films released were co-production deals with other studios, leaving much of the profits (if any) split in a way that did not leave the company with much to show for its efforts. In fact, it’d be almost 7 years before the studio would have a hit film’s grosses all to itself, in the form of 2001’s Shrek.

As the productions from the company start to enter into the book’s chapters, LaPorte picks and chooses among many of the studio’s live-action films. Naturally, she goes whole hog on some of the films being directed by Spielberg (focusing on his more dramatic directorial films like Amistad, Saving Private Ryan, & Munich). Some films are chosen for their complex productions (and cast and crew), such as The Peacemaker, Gladiator, and Dreamgirls, which in itself becomes a chapter that really envelopes David Geffen, who had wanted to make the musical into a film if it could be done right. Small shout outs are given to plenty of other film titles, usually the ones that barely made a blip on the box-office radar (such as Paulie, and Small Soldiers).

Animation fans (like myself) will most likely be drawn into the chapters and stories about Dreamworks Animation. Sources chronicle everything from Jeffrey Katzenberg’s hands-on approach during the production of Prince of Egypt, as well as some instances where when an animated film tanked (like 2000’s Road to El Dorado), Jeffrey seemed quick to blame everyone but himself for the film’s failure (on El Dorado, word was he even blamed the film’s songwriter, Elton John).

A couple chapters are also devoted to the now-defunct Dreamworks Interactive, and Dreamworks Records labels. Both of them are intriguing in how Spielberg attempted to bring his creativity to the Interactive unit, and how singer Nelly Furtado’s career was nurtured through the Records label, in the face of the changing music/radio landscape of the early 2000’s.

Reference is even made to Dreamworks Television, which found itself with one major hit on its hands, the Michael J Fox-starring Spin City. LaPorte also chronicles the rise and fall of the studio-produced Freaks and Geeks, which has since earned a cult-following on DVD.

We even learn of the studio’s struggles to go for the gold (aka The Academy Awards). In the wake of the eye-opening Oscar Race ending for 1998 (in which Dreamworks took home Best Director for Spielberg’s Saving Private Ryan, but Best Picture ended up going to Miramax’s film Shakespeare in Love), LaPorte structures what can best be described as a true campaign war, led by Dreamworks marketing executive Terry Press. Not wanting to be shown up by Miramax again, Press steps up her game, and ended up securing Dreamwork’s Best Picture wins at the Academy Awards for 2000-2002.

LaPorte’s experience writing for entertainment publications definitely helps move the story along, but she has a couple little quirks here and there. One of them is the occasional flinging around of Yiddish words when talk turns to Spielberg. As well, some of her facts aren’t completely infallible. At one point in discussing a spat between Dreamworks and Mike Myers, the book mistakenly says that it was Myers who starred in the 2000 film, The Grinch, not Jim Carrey.

In the end, LaPorte chronicles a start-up that with its big-name star power at the helm, could almost be considered like our current banking system: Too big to fail, or in the case of its 3 namesakes, too famous to fail. The hype was ratcheted so high, that you were either rooting for the underdog, or hoping for them to fall flat on their faces. In the end, numerous influences chipped away at the new studio. From outside influences like business models and the economy, to inner turmoil among producers, studio heads, and much more. Noone said running a studio would be easy, and LaPorte’s book never tires of leading its readers on a wild rollercoaster ride.